Mastodon
Unpredictable Parents Disrupt Brain Circuitry in Children

Unpredictable Parents Disrupt Brain Circuitry in Children

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

baby brain

Intuitively we all know that good parenting is essential to kids’ healthy development. We all agree on that. But as soon as we try to define what good parenting is we then enter into controversial territory with diverging opinions, multiple lines of differing research, and some of the world’s best-selling books. In the USA the legendary Dr Spock’s “The Common Sense Book of Child and Childcare” still ranks as one of the best-selling books of all time.

However, research has slowly built up a solid base of what it needs to bring up children.  The “all you need is love” philosophy proving to be extremely robust. Research into various animal models shows that offspring who receive more care developed better but also research into the brain shows that the brain responds by building more connections, and having healthier, or better formed, brain cell populations and networks.

I have written about the dramatic impacts on upbringing, which are particularly obvious when conditions are dire. So, the research is painting a clearer picture here. But this latest piece of research out gives us a clue to something else that seems to be critical – and many may already have worked out and intuited.

What is this?

It is about predictability or consistency of parenting. And in particular the focus on this study was on how this impacts brain circuits.

What did they find?

The researchers at the University of California Irvine compared brains of offspring in mice that were put into maternal care situations which had the same level of care but in one group the maternal behaviour was less predictable.
They found that this impacted the maturing brain at critical nodes impacting connectivity in key regulatory and emotional circuit nodes. This suggests that unpredictable parenting is associated with deficits in emotional control and behaviours. That’s really important to know.

 

This shows that care itself is not enough. Love and care is very good, but predictably seems to be something that is essential for healthy brain development. Something that is present in our SCOAP model with the “O” standing for Orientation which includes having a clear understanding of the world around us and this is clearly strongly formed in the developing brain by predictability of parents.

But I wouldn’t put this down to just parenting – predictability and consistency in behaviour is just as important in business as it is parenting. But if you brain hasn’t developed healthily in the first place, then it may be too late

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Matthew T. Birnie, Tallie Z. Baram. 
Principles of emotional brain circuit maturation
Science, 2022; 376 (6597): 1055
DOI: 10.1126/science.abn4016

More Quick Hits

A New Study on Inter-Brain Synchronisation

A New Study on Inter-Brain Synchronisation

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

heads brains thinking

In case you didn’t know it brain synchronisation (or inter-brain synchronisation) is a thing. And a pretty cool thing. This happens when two, or more, people do similar things together and their brains sync up meaning that the firing patterns become very similar to each other.

This means that that feeling of being on the same wavelength is a feeling for the very good reason that you actually are on the same wavelength. I have written in more detail about this effect, which is important, because it also predicts many things. For example, when solving business types of tasks, brain synchronisation predicts how effectively a team will operate together. And also, how well they solve problems together. Similarly in audiences at concerts brain synchronisation predicts how well they enjoy it.

We could assume that this is related to how similar we are – with similar experiences and attitudes we are most likely to have brain synchronisation, but this piece of research shows that babies and adults playing together also show strong brain synchronisation.

Researchers at Princeton University set up the first experiment of this kind. It must be noted that measuring inter-brain synchrony is hard at the best of times due to its complexities i.e. measuring multiple brains and matching timing precisely. They managed by recruiting 42 children and using a technology called functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) which measure blood flow similar to those pretty scans we often see.

However, 18 were too fidgety to give good readings and 3 flat out refused to wear the cap for measurement. That left 18 recordings.

Of interest is that in this study the same adult played with each child. Each child engaged in two scenarios: one playing with the adult, and another interacting with a parent while the other adult spoke to another person.

While the adult and child were playing brain synchronisation ramped up showing that similar processes were happening in their brains despite the large differences in age.

So, there you have it: parents when you play with your children you are getting on the same wavelength, and I am sure that is good for you.

For you business folk this is not just a random study, because inter-brain synchronisation is important for high performance in teams in business.

Here’s to syncing up!

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Elise A. Piazza, Liat Hasenfratz, Uri Hasson, Casey Lew-Williams. 
Infant and Adult Brains Are Coupled to the Dynamics of Natural Communication
Psychological Science, 2019; 095679761987869
DOI: 10.1177/0956797619878698

More Quick Hits

Unique Social Genes in Human Beings

Unique Social Genes in Human Beings

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

social brain

One differentiating factor with human beings is our pro-sociality. This means we are a social species, and this sociality is seen in our ability to empathise, be socially tolerant, but also in our cooperation and altruism.

The question then comes: what drives this behaviour and is this really different to other species? The second question is whether this is also different to other earlier human forms such as Neanderthals and Denisovans. To find that out researchers at the University of Barcelona did a genetic analysis of non-human primates such as chimpanzees and bonobos and also archaic humans.

How did they do this?

First off, they focused on genes that they know contribute to this pro-sociality. We know that these come along two pathways and are related to Oxytocin and Vasopressin (see box at end of article) – both of these hormones are heavily involved in various social behaviours such as friendship and romantic bonding, but also trust and loyalty.

Next was to identify functional sites of these genes and to see compared to other species and archaic humans if there were any differences.

What did they find?

They found, first, differences to modern and archaic human beings and non-human primates showing that various social functions seem to be different in modern or archaic humans.

Second, they found that there are two sites whereby modern human beings differ to archaic human beings showing that our sociality has also developed over time. It suggests that modern human sociality is much higher, or more advanced, and this is also likely one of the reasons why modern human beings have evolved and possible outcompeted other earlier human lines.

Third, these sites are also regions that are active in the brain particularly an area called the cingulate cortex which is a site that is associated with multiple social processing networks in the brain but also social deficits.

Human being, social being

So, all in we can see that human beings are social like many species, but that we differ in genetic expression to non-human primates but also to archaic humans. It is indeed our oxytocin that makes us particularly social and allows us to coordinate in groups, build a wide variety of friendships, to bond with others, to empathise, and to be charitable. There is also a downside to this, such as coordinated violence, which I explore in my article here on oxytocin.

So, all this points to, yes, human beings are special, and especially because of our sociality

Oxytocin – the cuddle hormone?

Oxytocin, a hormone and neuromodualtor, has received a lot of popular press over the years. One of these reasons is that it is invovled in many aspects of sociality. This attracted a lot of publicity when it was found that in voles, field mice, that mongamy and loyalty between pairs of voles was directly influenced and could be manipulated by oxytocin. Increase oxytocin and they become more monogamous and loyal to each other, and reduce oxytocin and this decreases. Was this the key to monogamy?

Well, kind of, but, as with all things, it is more complicated than that. But the upshot of this was a bunch of resarch into oxytocin that showed how it could influence bonding, feelings of warmth, and cuddling. It was also noted that many of these things in turn stimuatle oxytocin such as stroking your baby, a romantic partner, or even your pet.

Research then also branched into economic scenarios with some research showing oxytocin increases trust between strangers in financial scenarios.

Oxytocin is definitely strongly related to many social functions but also many physiolgical functions – it stimulates labour in women during childbirth and promotes milk production in new mothers. But oxytocin has also other effects – read here for a more detailed overview.

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Constantina Theofanopoulou, Alejandro Andirkó, Cedric Boeckx, Erich D. Jarvis. 
Oxytocin and vasotocin receptor variation and the evolution of human prosociality. 
Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2022; 11: 100139
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2022.100139

More Quick Hits

Want to Live Longer? Be Optimistic!

Want to Live Longer? Be Optimistic!

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

optimism aging brain

We probably all know some people who are particularly pessimistic – always putting a negative side to things and expecting the worst outcomes. We probably also know some people who are eternally optimistic – seeing the good in things and expecting positive outcomes. Well, we do know this can be good for many things, also for productivity and mood in the workplace. But this research also shows that being optimistic can also help you live longer.

This is good news – but only if you’re a woman! This doesn’t mean that optimistic men don’t live longer, just that this particularly study analysed the data from 159’255 women, participants in the US Women’s Health Initiative. This enrolled women between the ages of 50-79 between 1993-1998 and followed them for 26 years.

What did they find?

Simply put they found that the most optimistic lived longer on average and had the highest chances of living over 90. The most optimistic lived 5.4% longer and had a 10% higher chance of living over 90 than the least optimistic.

Isn’t this down to other factors?

There could be a chicken and egg problem her – it could be that those who do more healthy things are more optimistic and so the effect is not down to optimism itself. However, the researchers controlled for this and found that other lifestyle factors could explain only 25% of the difference. This doesn’t rule out other influences but seems to show that optimism itself is what is enabling people to live longer.

But how?

I have written about stress and positivity in other articles. Those who have followed my writing more closely know that stress and the ensuing low or high)-level inflammation can have particularly detrimental impacts on health over time. Being pessimistic is much more likely to be a higher stress state than being optimistic. Or in other words being optimistic will lower your stress and create a more positive hormonal balance in your body.

Of note is that this effect was seen across ethnic and social groupings.

So, never a truer word was said when somebody famously said “Don’t worry, be happy”…and this should also help you to live longer

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Hayami K. Koga, Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald, Lewina O. Lee, Peter James, Candyce Kroenke, Lorena Garcia, Aladdin H. Shadyab, Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher, JoAnn E. Manson, Francine Grodstein, Laura D. Kubzansky.
Optimism, lifestyle, and longevity in a racially diverse cohort of women
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17897

More Quick Hits

How Having Had COVID-19 Negatively Impacts Performance at Work

How Having Had COVID-19 Negatively Impacts Performance at Work

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

brain fog covid work performance

I’m sure we’re all aware of the various negative aspects of having contracted COVID-19 such as long COVID but also the brain fog that seems to have been a feature that many people have reported.

I have written on the long-term damage to the brain, or not, that has been reported, but this study simple looked at on the job performance of a group of 94 people. About half of which had not been diagnosed with COVID-19, and the other half who had at least a month previously.

They were then assessed on so-called cognitive failures at work. Cognitive failures are classed as problems with memory, attention, and action. They were also asked of their intention to stay or leave the company they were working for.

The results

The results showed that those who had had COVID-19 experienced more cognitive failures. They also self-rated their job performance as lower and also had increased intention to leave their job. Considering what we know about the subsequent brain fog this might not be surprising but shows that this does seem to directly impact job performance but interestingly also the intention to leave one’s job.

What was maybe more interesting and worrying is that these cognitive failures did not seem to diminish over time i.e. those that had COVID-19 earlier and had therefore had more recovery time, did not show lower cognitive failures. This is in line with previous studies showing long-term brain fog – however some reports have shown that this does decrease over time. But it takes time.

So, all in, it shows that irrespective of actual damage to the brain, that cognitive impairment is widely reported and seems to translate into lower work performance but also higher intention to leave. It would therefore be wise for companies to take this into account – and another good reason to avoid contracting COVID in the first place!

Although at this stage of the pandemic, it might be a bit late for that now

 

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

James W. Beck, Arden Flow
The effects of contracting Covid-19 on cognitive failures at work: implications for task performance and turnover intentions. 
Scientific Reports, 2022; 12 (1)
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13051-1

More Quick Hits