Mastodon
Narcissistic Leaders Block Knowledge Flow and Cooperation

Narcissistic Leaders Block Knowledge Flow and Cooperation

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

narcissism leadership brain

Narcissism is considered one of the three dark-triad traits and something that has been reported as being common in senior leaders.

The important question is can and does this hinder effective business practices or can narcissism give the drive to succeed that can benefit the business? Narcissists themselves would obviously argue that their skills and drive help the business.

This research out of the University of Washington suggests otherwise. And will come as no surprise to many employees and leadership experts.

In this study researchers analysed leaders of busines units of a large Chinese headhunting company. The leaders themselves rated their own narcissistic traits with a standardised questionnaire, the dynamics and complexity of the local market, and perceived competition with other business units. Their deputies were then asked to rate the level of knowledge sharing.

What did they find?

They found that narcissism led to decreased knowledge sharing. However, this was moderated by changing or complex environments. Notably when there was some stability and high inter-unit competition knowledge sharing was particularly stifled.

Some people may claim that having internal competition is beneficial to the organisation, but this shows that when, and if, knowledge sharing is important, which it certainly is in many complex organizations, this can actively hinder this. So be careful of too much internal competition and be careful of narcissistic leaders – or use them cautiously

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Xin Liu, Lin Zhang, Abhinav Gupta, Xiaoming Zheng, Changqi Wu.
Upper echelons and intra-organizational learning: How executive narcissism affects knowledge transfer among business units.
Strategic Management Journal, 2022
DOI: 10.1002/smj.3406

More Quick Hits

The Science of Exposing Liars

The Science of Exposing Liars

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

liar brain

The one place that we can consistently catch people lying is in job interviews. And the question has long been how do you catch out these liars? The answer is you need to outsmart them.

But how?

Well lying uses cognitive resources. It is effortful because you have to construct an alternative narrative in your head and then keep this in your mind as you answer questions on this, or questions related to this. It is an effortful process. Therefore, if you can disrupt this process, you can uncover the liars.

Professor Aldert Vrij, from the Department of Psychology at the University of Portsmouth used this principle to design an experiment to outsmart liars. The way he did this is to give interview participants a cognitive task – this cognitive task means participants need to use cognitive resources and so this makes it much more difficult to tell a convincing lie and stick to this accurately.

The experiment had participants interviewed about societal topics, but they were instructed to either represent their own honest views or to lie about their views. They were also given time to prepare for this interview, giving them the ability to prepare elaborate and convincing lies.  They were also incentivised by being entered into a prize draw. However, they were also given a 7-digit license plate number to remember. And some were told that if they failed to remember this, they would have an additional task of writing down their opinions after the interview.

What were the results?

They found that the additional cognitive tasks made the liars stories less plausible but, interestingly, only if this was considered important. This shows that if it is not considered important, they do not commit the cognitive resources to it, and so can lie more effectively.

So, to catch out liars you need to give them cognitive tasks that they will engage in, and this will inhibit their ability to construct plausible lies.

This can be done in interviews but may be a problem in every day life!

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Aldert Vrij, Haneen Deeb, Sharon Leal and Ronald P. Fisher. 
The Effects of a Secondary Task on True and False Opinion Statement
International Journal of Psychology & Behavior Analysis, 2022
DOI: 10.15344/2455-3867/2022/185

More Quick Hits

High Traffic Noise at School, Slower Cognitive Development

High Traffic Noise at School, Slower Cognitive Development

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

noise brain development learning

Who would have thought that traffic noise could impact cognitive development of kids? Well according to this recent piece of research it can.

Are you sure?

Well, these researchers from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health designed a pretty comprehensive study. They measure the cognitive ability of 2’680 children over 12 months on attention and working memory. They were tested four times over this 12-month period.

They attended 38 different schools and noise was measured in front of the school, in the playground, and in the classrooms.

What were the results?

The results were pretty clear. Those attending schools with higher noise levels had slower cognitive development. They were able to quantify this:

    • A 5 dB increase in outdoor noise levels resulted in working memory development that was 11.4% slower than average
    • A 5 dB increase in outdoor noise levels resulted in complex working memory development that was 23.5% slower than average. Similarly,
    • A 5 dB increase in outdoor noise levels resulted in attention capacity development that was 4.8% slower than average.

Isn’t this a result of socioeconomic factors rather than noise?

It could be that poorer kids are at schools that have more noise, and that these kids are at multiple disadvantages. However, this association was dependent on noise not location. There were also other interesting correlations. Notably that noise variation in the classroom seemed to have particularly disruptive effective and this was more indicative than the average noise level.

Similarly, a noise map was used to estimate noise levels at each child’s home, and this did not seem to impact cognitive development.

It seems that noise, particularly with variation within the classroom is most disruptive, likely because this is where critical aspects of cognitive development take place.

Obviously, this would need to be followed up with more studies in more locations but, for the moment this is pretty worrying and something else that local and education authorities need to take into account

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Maria Foraster, Mikel Esnaola, Mónica López-Vicente, Ioar Rivas, Mar Álvarez-Pedrerol, Cecilia Persavento, Nuria Sebastian-Galles, Jesus Pujol, Payam Dadvand, Jordi Sunyer. 
Exposure to road traffic noise and cognitive development in schoolchildren in Barcelona, Spain: A population-based cohort study
PLOS Medicine, 2022; 19 (6): e1004001
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004001

More Quick Hits

How Gratitude between Co-Workers Lowers Stress and Increases Performance

How Gratitude between Co-Workers Lowers Stress and Increases Performance

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

business neuroleadership stress brain

Gratitude is a nice thing to have, I think we all agree on that. But when it comes to the workplace some may see it is just being nice, and not being focused enough on the hard realities of work. Or worse see it as turning the workplace soft! But a study just out, shows how gratitude can have multiple positive impacts – also on performance.

How did they measure this?

The researchers at the University of California put 200 participants through a high-stress competitive task in teams of two. This involved a task that was basically impossible to complete: coming up with a proposal in 6 minutes for a product to use on campus and followed by a six-minute presentation to a panel of judges. As you can see this is designed to optimally raise stress within very short- time frames to complete a task and then face a panel of judges. This was also combined with a financial reward of $200 dollars to give financial incentives meaning something was also at stake. Increasing rewards has also been shown to increase stress.

During the task participants wore electrodes on their heart and neck to measure heart signals and also wore a blood pressure cuff to monitor blood pressure.

Some of the teams were randomly assigned to express gratitude whereby one team member would express gratitude or thanks to the other team member prior to completing the task.

What were the results?

In both parts of the experiment, the design phase and the pitch phase, a short gratitude intervention, of one team member expressing gratitude to the other, improved cardiovascular responses. This pushed the response pattern from a negative stress response to what is known as a challenge response. This is when stress optimises performance rather than restricts performance.

This shows that gratitude lowers stress and improves performance in either a creative collaborative task or a high stakes performance tasks such as presenting to this panel of judges.

The researchers note that this gratitude intervention increases concentration, gives more confidence, and allows more people to reach peak performance. All while avoiding the negative effects of stress. This not to mention playing a fundamental role in strengthening relationships.

If that ain’t a good thing, I don’t know what is

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Yumeng Gu, Joseph M. Ocampo, Sara B. Algoe & Christopher Oveis.
Gratitude Expressions Improve Teammates’ Cardiovascular Stress Responses
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General (In press), 2022

More Quick Hits

How Poverty Messes Up Babies’ Brains

How Poverty Messes Up Babies’ Brains

The Dramatic Impact of Poverty in Newborns Brains

​Reading time: about 5 minutes

baby brain

So, does being poor impact your brain, or are people with decreased cognitive ability poor?

Some people may have strong opinions on the above question. Probably broadly along political partisan lines. But the best place to answer this question is with research and science and the answer is coming firmly down on the side of, poverty disrupts you brain. If I were being dramatic, I might say it “wreaks havoc” “destroys” or some other emotional descriptions. They might actually be very good descriptions.

But how?

First, let’s review some recent research out which is really interesting because it scanned newborn babies’ brains while they were sleeping. This is really important because it showed that this life disadvantage is there right from day one. That is very worrying.

The researchers at Washington University School of Medicine analysed a sample of 399 mothers and their babies. 280 of these were at a social disadvantage - scientific language for being poor. And these newborns showed significant differences to their brains to babies born to mothers in better social conditions.

The scans showed

  • Less cortical gay matter  -  cortical gray matter is the outer layer of the brain considered our higher functional area of the brain (but involved in a lot including sensory processing). The gray matter is the area that houses your neurons, brain cells.
  • Less sub-cortical gray matter  –  subcortical gray matter refers to regions that sit in the internal regions of the brain which are often important for emotional functions but also memory and general functional processing. As I said, gray matter houses your neurons, brain cells
  • Less white matter  -  white matter refers to the mass of connections between brain regions. So, this suggests less connections between all brain regions, or less efficient connections.
  • Fewer and shallower folds in the brain – the folds in the brain give it that wrinkly look and allows the brain to have more surface area but is also a sign of a mature or more functional brain.

This is quite dramatic  –  though the absolute differences may not be large, it all points to a less developed, or functional brain, at all levels. This was simply comparing two groups of newborns shortly after birth. This means these babies are at a disadvantage right from the outset - even before anything else happens these kids are starting at -1.

This is worrying and another study from the same dataset asked another question.

How does crime exposure affect newborns’ brains?

For this study they analysed what neighbourhoods these pregnant women lived in and hence their potential exposure to property or violent crime. And the results again are worrying. But the results were different: in the aforementioned study the results seemed to impact the whole brain and not specific regions of it but in this study various functional networks were affected.

brain scans

A number of networks were affected but the most relevant is that of the thalamus-amygdala-hippocampus network. This may sound like gobbledygook to you but this is a network that connects sensory information to emotional responses and to memory functions. So, in short disrupted emotional and memory networks.

The same applies as to the previously mentioned study. This was in newborns with just the mothers living in higher crime neighbourhoods  –  just this was enough to see a significant difference in these newborn babies’ brains.

So, those kids born in poverty with these mothers being exposed to crime during pregnancy seem to be starting life at -2. Decreased brain maturity and disrupted emotional and memory networks. Not good, very bad indeed.

It is also really important to note that we haven’t even begun to speak about developmental factors and how these brains can and do develop in socially deprived environments, nor have we spoken about epigenetics, such as how stress can pass an gene activation patterns to offspring.

This also shows that breaking out of this cycle requires more than just proclaiming that people need to make the good choices in life. Of course, they do, but starting out with a brain that is already less developed and with disrupted networks is only likely to perpetuate this poverty cycle.

What about brain development?

We do know, of course, that there are many developmental factors that can and do contribute to brain development of children in positive ways. In this article here I outline the ground-breaking research that showed that care for children could massively boost IQ.

The Abecedarian Project in the USA showed that pre-school education could leave traces in the brain that could be seen 50 years later. Similarly, breast feeding has been shown to improve the brain health of children and also of mothers  –  and, again, this can be seen decades later in the brain. In addition, exercise and movement improves children’s brain signatures  –  with exercise in pre-teen years leaving a signature on the brain also observable many years later.

That is all good but what the observant amongst you will notice is these are also often related to social standing.

Pre schooling  -  particularly high quality pre schooling is basically only available for those who can afford it or live in the right neighbourhoods. High quality nutrition also.

Breastfeeding may seem like a cheap option to help with your kids’ brain development, but this necessitates actually being able to breastfeed with your children, the mother having the right nutrition, and being able to do this. If a mother is living in poverty and trying to hold down two jobs to feed herself and her children, this may be out of the question. And often is.

Similarly, taking part in structured sporting activities is something that comes with social settings  -  but it is something that could be a cost-effective intervention for many children.

A just society?

So, if we do want a society that can grow and flourish, if we want a just society, if we want a good society, we should pay close attention to this.

Development of children’s brains happens before they are born - interventions that help pregnant mothers, particularly those who are impoverished, will have a significant benefit on those babies’ brains. Similarly investing in interventions pre-school also.

The worrying take-away, and important message, is that poverty really does mess with your brain. It does this as an adult but more importantly, as I have just outlined, based on scientific evidence, it messes with your brain right from the outset  -  from before you are born.

This also massively raises the importance of investing in and enabling interventions at this stage  – guided by science rather than political opinions.

After all who wouldn’t want a society with better brains. I do

 

 

 

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

References

Regina L. Triplett, Rachel E. Lean, Amisha Parikh, J. Philip Miller, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Sydney Kaplan, Dominique Meyer, Christopher Adamson, Tara A. Smyser, Cynthia E. Rogers, Deanna M. Barch, Barbara Warner, Joan L. Luby, Christopher D. Smyser.
Association of Prenatal Exposure to Early-Life Adversity With Neonatal Brain Volumes at Birth. 
JAMA Network Open, 2022; 5 (4): e227045
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7045

Rebecca G. Brady, Cynthia E. Rogers, Trinidi Prochaska, Sydney Kaplan, Rachel E. Lean, Tara A. Smyser, Joshua S. Shimony, George M. Slavich, Barbara B. Warner, Deanna M. Barch, Joan L. Luby, Christopher D. Smyser.
The Effects of Prenatal Exposure to Neighborhood Crime on Neonatal Functional Connectivity. 
Biological Psychiatry, 2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.01.020

More Healthy and Society Brains articles

Eat Less to Live Longer

Eat Less to Live Longer

When we talk of healthy brains we automatically think of things like exercise and nutrition that I have covered at times here. But the thing we put into the brain most is oxygen. So, let’s have a quick look at how the air we breathe impacts brain performance.