Mastodon
Can Having More Children Reduce Cognitive Functioning?

Can Having More Children Reduce Cognitive Functioning?

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

mother child brain

 

Having more children and late life cognition is not something that is generally researched. There are more obvious avenues such as diet, education, exercise, or socio-economic factors. That’s also why this recently published study caught my attention.

So, (to put it bluntly) can having more children make you stupider in your old age?

It seems so, but first let’s understand the limitations and why this could be the case.

First, this study, out of Columbia, analysed data from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to look at the extent to which having three or more children, versus two children, affects late-life cognition. SHARE collects representative data from 20 European countries and in this case they were over 65 and had at least two biological children.

So, what did they find – well, yes, as I said they found that having three or more children, compared to two, reduced cognitive ability in later life – this was equivalent to 6.2 years of aging. That is a pretty large effect. Of note is that they crunched the numbers to indicate causation rather than correlation.

This effect was worst in northern European countries likely because in these countries having more children does not confer any additional resources or benefits.

What do they consider the reason for this:

    1. Having additional children incurs significant costs which can lead to a decreased quality of life or dropping below the poverty line.
    2. Having additional children lowers women’s labour market participation. This further lowers income but also working confers cognitive benefits.
    3. Having children is stressful and can have longer impacts on health and mental health

Of note is that it seems that there is no additional social benefit from having three or more children over two – social contact does not increase. These effects were much larger in the North of Europe than the South for multiple reasons such as cost of living and social structures.

The study didn’t explore other variations such as comparison to having only one child or none – they recommend this for future studies. It is also important to have this knowledge with people living ever longer and late life health and cognitive functioning becoming ever more important.

So, all in two children is enough – and that is exactly what I have. Phew!

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Eric Bonsang, Vegard Skirbekk.
Does Childbearing Affect Cognitive Health in Later Life? Evidence From an Instrumental Variable Approach.
Demography, 2022
DOI: 10.1215/00703370-9930490

More Quick Hits

Reversing aging – with poo!

Reversing aging – with poo!

Quick HitsDaily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences   ho wouldn't want to age better - well the results of an unsual study are in and the results are promising and may make many of you who are aging prick up your ears. The...

How Sleep Helps Your Brain Manage Fear

How Sleep Helps Your Brain Manage Fear

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

sleep brain health

Sleeping well is essential to brain health

Sleep on i” is common advice for many reasons. Often to consolidate thoughts and help boost creativity. This is a well-known effect. We also know that sleep is the time that helps to detoxify and grow the brain and body, and I have reported on some of these effects in different posts. But this latest research, from the University of Bern, here in Switzerland, supports another hypothesis of sleep — namely that it helps with your emotions.

That sleep, particularly REM sleep (REM sleep is the light sleep phases often associated with dreaming), helps consolidate emotions has been long known. But these researchers found out precisely how this happens in brain cells themselves and this is pretty cool, I have to say.

So, what did they find?

First off, these researchers conditioned mice to two signals. One a fear signal and second, a safety signal. These are the two obvious big emotions in terms of survival and something that is present in all species of animal. They were then able to precisely track these signals in the mice.

What they then found during sleep was astonishing. They found that there was decoupling within neurons to these signals. Specifically, the cell body seemed to be deactivated whereas the dendrites the connecting arms of the neurons activated and processing the emotion. This, the researchers note translates into preferential processing in sleep of safety signals and avoidance of overgeneralising fear emotions which can become generalised anxiety — and they suspect potentially lead to anxiety disorders.

So, the brain needs sleep to process emotions and recorrect emotional signalling but specifically the decoupling of brain cells enables the processing of fear without generalising this. Clever old brain cells.

So, another, another, very good reason to get a good night’s sleep. If you are wondering how much — this latest research here answers that.

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Mattia Aime, Niccolò Calcini, Micaela Borsa, Tiago Campelo, Thomas Rusterholz, Andrea Sattin, Tommaso Fellin, Antoine Adamantidis.
Paradoxical somatodendritic decoupling supports cortical plasticity during REM sleep.
Science, 2022; 376 (6594): 724
DOI: 10.1126/science.abk2734

More Quick Hits

Reversing aging – with poo!

Reversing aging – with poo!

Quick HitsDaily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences   ho wouldn't want to age better - well the results of an unsual study are in and the results are promising and may make many of you who are aging prick up your ears. The...

Video games can boost children’s intelligence

Video games can boost children’s intelligence

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

gaming children intelligence

 

Well, this is not the answer many of us would expect, and it goes against other logic of spending more time doing other things such as reading or socialising with friends (which the science also says is extremely beneficial to developing brains).

So, what did these researchers from the Karolinska institute in Sweden find and how did they find this?

The researchers around Bruno Sauce surveyed 5’000 children in the USA between the ages of nine and ten. They conducted a battery of tests, including cognitive and intelligence tests. Their parents were also asked about the children’s screen time and how much they spent on various activities. There was then a follow up 2 years later.

They found that those that spent most time on video games increased their intelligence by, on average, 2.5 points (or about 2.5%). There was no significant effect observed for TV or social media usage (positive or negative). In case you’re interested the average for these 5’000 children was 2.5 hrs of TV per day, half an hour on social media and an hour playing video games. I imagine there was a large variation in that. Remember these were between the ages of nine and ten at the outset of the study.

So, what to make of this?

Firstly, on closer inspection that playing video games increases intelligence shouldn’t be such a large surprise. Playing games requires multiple cognitive resources and is an active activity, in contrast to the passive activity of watching TV, with social media somewhere in the middle.

Secondly, it also shows that intelligence is a more a fluid concept than many think. With active use of cognitive resources intelligence does and will increase – this is an important, if not the most important, take away from this study.

However, a big caveat is they didn’t measure other aspects which we know will be important such as wellbeing, physical activity, or school performance, all of which can be critical factors in a child’s life and healthy development.

Of note also is that the hours of engagement with video games seem reasonable.

So, allowing kids to play video games, if they so wish, for reasonable amounts of time, is in fact a good thing and has benefits over simply watching TV. It isn’t a free card either – other things do count such as physical activity and nutrition which I have also written about multiple times here.

It might also do some of us oldies a bit of good as well!

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Bruno Sauce, Magnus Liebherr, Nicholas Judd, Torkel Klingberg.
The impact of digital media on children’s intelligence while controlling for genetic differences in cognition and socioeconomic background.
Scientific Reports, 2022; 12 (1)
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11341-2

More Quick Hits

Reversing aging – with poo!

Reversing aging – with poo!

Quick HitsDaily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences   ho wouldn't want to age better - well the results of an unsual study are in and the results are promising and may make many of you who are aging prick up your ears. The...

Just how many people get COVID brain?

Just how many people get COVID brain?

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

covid-19 brain

 

There are many questions still open about COVID and the brain. There is no doubt that long COVID exists, and this can have dramatic impacts on people’s lives. But just how much COVID impacts the brain is unclear – we know that many people suffer cognitive and neurological symptoms – commonly referred to as “brain fog”. But the precise mechanisms are unclear – it is likely a combination of factors that lead can lead to damage in the brain, though one major study was more optimistic noting that many of the conditions are treatable or that underlying previously unidentified conditions were coming to the surface.

In comes this recent study out of the Boston School of Medicine which has aimed to quantify this more precisely. They found that 13% of people who had been admitted to hospital for COVID developed serious neurological symptoms. Most commonly noted was encephalopathy which covers a broad range of symptoms or conditions that leads to impaired neurological functioning. Other conditions such as stroke were much rarer. Though we know that these symptoms can occur even if symptoms are mild, they are much more common with sever illness and worse health outcomes – this includes chances of being admitted to intensive care and being ventilated. There are also racial differences, but this is not clear why.

Of obvious concern is that with the numbers of severe infections being so high, particularly in the USA, this leaves an awfully large amount of people who have had, and still have long COVID and potential long-term cognitive impairment.

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Anna M. Cervantes-Arslanian, Chakradhar Venkata, Pria Anand, et al.
Neurologic Manifestations of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in Hospitalized Patients During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Critical Care Explorations, 2022; 4 (4): e0686
DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000686

More Quick Hits

Reversing aging – with poo!

Reversing aging – with poo!

Quick HitsDaily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences   ho wouldn't want to age better - well the results of an unsual study are in and the results are promising and may make many of you who are aging prick up your ears. The...

Brain networks and losing weight – successfully or not

Brain networks and losing weight – successfully or not

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

brain food weightloss

 

Is weight loss all in the mind?

Well, with the danger of oversimplifying a complex topic, this latest research shows it is, and shows precisely how and with what networks. So, what did these researchers find?

The goal of this study was to measure the effectiveness of a behaviour-based (a good old-fashioned diet with restriction of calories) weight loss intervention. This was carried out by Jonathon Burdette and his team – they had previously identified two networks that are related to weight loss. These, called Functional Network 1 and 2 in this study (FN1 or FN2) with FN1 a network related to sensory and motor control and FN2 related to attention and cognitive control.

Participants were scanned in resting state (while doing nothing) and then after completing a food-cue task. They then completed a 6-month programme for weight loss and their results measured and then compared to their brain scans. What did they find?

They found that those who failed to lose weight had higher activity in FN1 in the resting state and lower activity in FN2 after the food-cue task. This may not sound clear but what it actualyl suggetss is those who had trouble losing weight had a higher natural desire to search out and find food in a resting state combined with inhibited or lower emotional regulation, control, and focus in the presence of food.

This therefore suggests that even in resting state the brain is activated differently and rather than a question of simple will power, it is different neural activation patterns – which may be less of a problem “in the wild” but in modern society when there are food cues everywhere, this can be obviously problematic.

The researchers don’t give any tips at this stage, but it is a step forward in understanding some of the challenges and dynamics of weight loss and getting obese in the first place. It also shows that a more individualised approach is necessary because individuals face different challenges.

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Jonathan H. Burdette, Mohsen Bahrami, Paul J. Laurienti, Sean L. Simpson, Barbara J. Nicklas, Jason Fanning, W. Jack Rejeski.
Longitudinal relationship of baseline functional brain networks with intentional weight loss in older adults.
Obesity, 2022; 30 (4): 902
DOI: 10.1002/oby.23396

More Quick Hits

Reversing aging – with poo!

Reversing aging – with poo!

Quick HitsDaily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences   ho wouldn't want to age better - well the results of an unsual study are in and the results are promising and may make many of you who are aging prick up your ears. The...

Reversing aging – with poo!

Reversing aging – with poo!

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

microbiome aging brain

 

Who wouldn’t want to age better – well the results of an unsual study are in and the results are promising and may make many of you who are aging prick up your ears.

The results showed that by transferring gut microbiota from younger to older mice improved multiple signs of aging in the gut, the eyes, and the brain. So far so good but the method with which this is done may make you cringe. This transfer is done through faecal transplants, yes, that is transplanting poo, or matter from your gut!

Now though this may sound disgusting, this is also a known treatment in cases of gut disorders – with a lot of success. Indeed, I have reported on the multiple impacts of the microbiota, our collection of bacteria, on multiple disorders ranging from loneliness, to depression, to increased cognitive ability. It seems like our microbiota is an essential ingredient to remaining healthy and particularly also in aging well.

This particular experiment was focused on aging and also follows on from positive results from blood plasma transplants between young and old mice. Of note is also that the experimental protocol involved faecal transplants from young to older mice and measuring the impacts through different biological markers, and alternatively transferring faecal matter from old mice to young mice and also measuring the impacts.

As already mentioned, when transferring from young to old, the older mice saw improvements in multiple markers in the gut, eyes, and brain. In the reverse condition when the young mice received faecal matter from old mice their condition deteriorated showing the opposite effects with increased inflammation in the brain and depletion of a protein required for normal vision.

This opens up promising new avenues for aging well – and yes, there are already plenty of startups in this space – I am sure that will only increase.

I for one am watching this space closely.

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Aimée Parker, Stefano Romano, Rebecca Ansorge, Asmaa Aboelnour, Gwenaelle Le Gall, George M. Savva, Matthew G. Pontifex, Andrea Telatin, David Baker, Emily Jones, David Vauzour, Steven Rudder, L. Ashley Blackshaw, Glen Jeffery, Simon R. Carding.
Fecal microbiota transfer between young and aged mice reverses hallmarks of the aging gut, eye, and brain.
Microbiome, 2022; 10 (1)
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-022-01243-w

More Quick Hits

Reversing aging – with poo!

Reversing aging – with poo!

Quick HitsDaily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences   ho wouldn't want to age better - well the results of an unsual study are in and the results are promising and may make many of you who are aging prick up your ears. The...