Mastodon
Adventurous Play Boosts Mental Resilience in Kids

Adventurous Play Boosts Mental Resilience in Kids

children health brain

 

So, a simple cheap way to help your kids improve all life skills and strengthen mental wellbeing. Too good to be true?

Well, this piece of research, just out, finds a fascinating correlation with mental health and kids. This correlation was also surprising – some things kids do, and their personality traits, we can assume could be related to positive mental health. Traits such as extraversion meaning you are likely to bond closer to people and hence this can provide support networks. So, what did these researchers around Helen Dodd from the University of Essex in the UK find?

The researchers surveyed 2’346 parents pre covid and during the first covid lockdown in the UK with questions on general mental health and mood. They found that those kids who spend more time playing outside in more unstructured and adventurous games had fewer “internalising” problems i.e. anxiety and depression during the first covid lockdown.

What’s more this effect was more pronounced in children from lower income families.

This highlights the importance of play – I have written in other places of how beneficial play is for multiple reasons. Basically, it is one of the best ways to build your brain. But importantly it is free and actually easily accessible for most people.

Adventurous play according to this also seems to be important because it uses cognitive skills that are very important such as exploration but also risk balancing and likely also failure and recovery and trying again. Critical life skills – but this also seems to have a buffer against mental health issues and that is really important to note.

This shows that some of things we can do as a society are cheap and easily accessible – but society can also encourage this through giving access to parks and well-designed play areas.

So as a parent you should be encouraging your kids to get out and play – and hey, there’s nothing wrong with you adults doing it also!

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Helen F. Dodd, Rachel J. Nesbit, Lily FitzGibbon.
Child’s Play: Examining the Association Between Time Spent Playing and Child Mental Health.
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2022;
DOI: 10.1007/s10578-022-01363-2

 

More Quick Hits

So, Meditation Doesn’t Change Your Brain – Or Does It?

So, Meditation Doesn’t Change Your Brain – Or Does It?

meditation brain wellbeing

 

M editation can actually change your brain. “Oh, no it can’t!” say these researchers. “Oh, yes it can!” say a lot of other researchers.

Does this start to sound confusing?

Well, it does because there has been plenty of evidence that meditation has plenty of positive effects on wellbeing and particularly in stress reduction and this has been reported to leave structural traces in the brain.

So, who is right?

To answer that question, we have to understand what we are trying to measure and how we are doing this. For example, a bunch of meditation researchers noted in 2018 that there is little consistency in meditation research. Why so – well the nature of meditation is that you could be doing different types of meditation for different periods of times with different population groups: experienced meditators, novices, those who are stressed, etc, etc.

On top of this once you start doing brain scanning studies these become very expensive, which therefore needs funding, and sample sizes decrease massively – it takes a long time to scan people.

So, this leaves us with two fundamental problems. First of comparability, and second of sample sizes. These researchers around Richard J. Davidson at University of Wisconsin-Madison aimed to resolve this. They recruited 218 (a much larger group than in most meditation studies) people with no previous experience of meditation or mindfulness, and they all had brain scans. They were then randomly assigned to one of three groups.

    • An eight-week mindfulness training programme with trained instructors.
    • An eight-week Health Enhancement Programme
    • A control group with no action taken or instructed

They all then repeated the brain scans. So, what did they find?

They found no significant changes to the brain of those in the intervention groups.

Disappointing right? Well, not really and the researchers themselves note why:

    • Some previous studies have taken people who have voluntarily enrolled in a stress reduction course, for example. This means they are already stressed and reducing this will have significant changes. Note though that it probably doesn’t have to be a mindfulness intervention.
    • The intervention is short, so this does not rule out changes over longer periods of time.
    • Meditation is a complex cognitive process that will impact multiple regions of the brain, and this can and will be very individualised. This means across a large group it will be hard to identify and consolidate any patterns.
    • Those in the two intervention groups reported increased wellbeing compared to the control group. So, meditation or a health intervention do have positive subjective impacts.

So does meditation change the brain? Well, the basic paradigm of neuroscience is what “what fires together, wires together” which translates as if you do something you build new connections, or strengthen existing connections. So yes, if you do something different it will leave a trace in the brain over time. But this applies to everything: if you start playing tennis, chess, reading more, playing cognitive games, etc. etc. These will all change your brain if it is new, and will build and strengthen specific circuits. How it changes is another question, and this is likely very individualised.

But there are also clear health benefits, and this in itself is a good thing. But as the above research also noted this doesn’t have to be meditation.

So, my advice to you is: if you enjoy meditation, do it. You will be reaping multiple benefits. If you don’t, make sure you focus on other ways to manage your health – because that will lead to higher wellbeing – and a happier life. And who doesn’t want that.

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Tammi R. A. Kral, Kaley Davis, Cole Korponay, Matthew J. Hirshberg, Rachel Hoel, Lawrence Y. Tello, Robin I. Goldman, Melissa A. Rosenkranz, Antoine Lutz, Richard J. Davidson.
Absence of structural brain changes from mindfulness-based stress reduction: Two combined randomized controlled trials.
Science Advances, 2022; 8 (20)
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abk3316

More Quick Hits

The Life Factors that Make Lonely People Lonely

The Life Factors that Make Lonely People Lonely

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

lonely brain health

 

You may assume, logically at first glance, that not having contact to people is the most important factor in loneliness. And obviously this does have a large impact — but there are a number of paradoxes because we know some people can be alone and feel very good with themselves — this is also known as the wisdom-loneliness paradox.

In this paradox we know that people who rate highly on wisdom seem to be pretty immune to the negative sides of loneliness and can be alone and happy. There are a number of reasons that we know influence this, one is a sense of meaning and purpose in life but also of being connected to the greater good. Another intriguing factor is that of our gut microbiome which correlates to loneliness, or not — yes you read that correctly. Read more here.

We also know from brain scanning that lonely people also feel more threatened. So, it is more complicated than just having contact to people — which is obviously still very important.

And this is where this newly released research out of the Vienna University of Economics and Business in Austria led by Sophie Buthmuller, is very interesting. What Guthmuller did is analyse data from individuals (from SHARE — a cross-national Survey on Health, Ageing, and Retirement) to see which factors correlated highest with loneliness in those over 50. And the results may surprise you — to a degree:

  • The largest influencing factor that related with loneliness in older age accounting for 43.32% of the variance was ill health. This could be for many reasons but obviously it means people are unable to take control of their lives and get out and about
  • The next highest factor was social support, and this would include having social support networks such as family and friends or social services. I have reported previously on the benefits of friendships for your brain, cognitive functioning, and general wellbeing here.

There are however two other factors that contribute to risk of loneliness, and these are

  • Personality which may be no surprise. Loneliness was highest in those high on neuroticism, and lowest on those who rated higher on conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and openness.
  • The other factor that contributes to loneliness is childhood circumstances this is, maybe, surprising and could also be interrelated with the above-mentioned personality factors. Those people that had the best relationships as children i.e. comfortable friendships were at lower risk of loneliness.

So, the research confirms some of the obvious that social support is important but also that ill-health is a key contributing factor and that there are other risk factors which could allow earlier identification of those at risk and mitigation actions.

My personality at least should offer me some protection and my modest wisdom!

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Sophie Guthmuller. 
Loneliness among older adults in Europe: The relative importance of early and later life conditions
PLOS ONE, 2022; 17 (5): e0267562
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267562

More Quick Hits

How Music Helps With Collective Grief

How Music Helps With Collective Grief

music brain grief

 

This study recently out analyses a fascinating episode in China at the start of the pandemic.

 A group of international musicians in Shenzhen produced a viral hit in China. This was a cover version of Michael Jackson’s “you are not alone” this was particularly suitable because it focused on multiple aspects of distress that the population was going through such as encouragement, empathy, but also positivity, and hope.

This was posted on the Chinese social media service WeChat, which has 1.2 billion users, and became a viral hit but also a source of encouragement and collective mourning for millions and millions of Chinese.
Lydia Giménez-Llort, professor of the Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine and researcher at the INC-UAB researched and analyzed how this impacted the population. What she found was that this particular music, and indicating suitable music in general, was very helpful in helping the population process their collective grief and shock at the start of the pandemic when millions of people were in a collective strict lockdown in China.

She also found that’s the music helped to guide people through grief stages such as that proposed by Kübler Ross when people go through different phases of grief or that by Taylor of “tend and befriend”. What is also noticeable in this particular example is that the musicians were international musicians and the song itself was an international song suggesting that it is the music itself and the message that is in the music that is most effective.

This goes some way to explain why us human beings are naturally drawn to music in times of grief, but it also highlights how this is an important part of the healing process and something that combined collectives and society can benefit from and so it is not to be underestimated.

Some people do claim that music is a basic need and though this doesn’t prove it, it does show that music is very important in our lives and can do many things much more important than just “entertainment”.

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Lydia Giménez-Llort
‘You’re Not Alone for China’: The First Song in Times of COVID-19 to Keep the Faith in a World Crying in Silence.
Behavioral Sciences, 2022; 12 (4): 88
DOI: 10.3390/bs12040088

More Quick Hits

Why it pays for companies to help workers have a good day in the office

Why it pays for companies to help workers have a good day in the office

Positive team coffee break

 

Business and executives in those businesses are more than keen to get a competitive advantage. To this end they invest heavily in technology and getting the right people to do the job.

But, I am sure, we are all more than aware that the work environment is also crucial to high performance. And this study, just out, gives an interesting take from a large dataset on this. The researchers around Alexander McKay at Virginia Commonwealth University analysed data from 11,000 surveys of employees sharing everyday work experiences and rated these into factors that stimulate or inhibit creativity. Creativity being a key metric to getting a competitive advantage for businesses.

What did they find?

Analysing the data showed that they could categorise the types of days that employees had into five categories:

      1. Toxic days: these are days that are high in conflict, obstacles and are missing stimulant factors. Fortunately, “only” 8% of days.
      2. Disengaged days: these are das that are low in all factors and represent disengagement and make up about 10% of days.
      3. Typical days: these are days that are well, average, a moderate amount of stimulance but also obstacles. These account, unsurprisingly for the majority of days. About 34% of days.
      4. Ideal days: these are the days we should probably aspire to with high stimulant factors but low obstacles and conflict. Notably they still had time pressure. These make up about 30% of workdays (which ain’t too bad actually).
      5. Crises days: these are days that are high in stimulant factors but also high in obstacle factors which seem to be around “good” conflict and wrestling with key problems. These make up about 20% of days.

So, in a hypothetical week, employees are in a bad place for half a day, disengaged for another half, in typical work mode for 1.5 days, in optimal work mode for 1.5 days, and spend 1 day in crises mode.

The next question is are these positive days actually better for creativity?

And this was a resounding yes. Those days which are ideal days rated much higher on creativity output but they also note that workers’ perceived creativity and productivity may actually be mismatched. The data for example shows that crises days are not as creative as workers rate them. Another note is that these days don’t average out as I did above nicely mixed up over a week. They tend to occur concurrently, so a toxic day is more likely to follow another toxic day. This can increase stress significantly – this shows that there can be a tendency to get in a rut – a positive one, or a negative one.

This also means it is important to try to manage this proactively.

This is therefore another piece of impressive and solid evidence as to why helping workers to have a good day at work will reap dividends for any business.

So what’s stopping you or your business making this happen?

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Alexander S. McKay, Mayoor Mohan, Christopher S. Reina.
Another day, another chance: Daily workplace experiences and their impact on creativity.
Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2021; 39 (3): 292
DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12573

More Quick Hits