Mastodon

Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

brain group bias

Us vs. them is known as in-groups vs. out-groups in psychology. This is the well-known effect of people being loyal to their own groups and being competitive and often aggressive to the out-group. This happens in multiple groups. Obvious ones are nationalities, religious groups, sports teams, but also geographical regions.

Previous research has shown that we human beings are very good at creating groups and this can be formed very quickly. We also know that these groups, at extreme levels, can be the cause of much of what we consider evil in society, aggression, abuse, murder, torture, and genocide. What may also be surprising, to some, is that all evidence points to this being hardwired i.e. babies as young as 3-months-old exhibit favouritism to in-groups and out-groups and this includes punishing the out-group and rewarding the in-group!

Now researchers at the Virginia Commonwealth University have investigated this effect further and come to some surprising, to some, conclusions!

What did they find?

They put 35 male college students through online competitive aggressive tasks. For this they told they would be competing with participants from a rival university. In fact, they competed against a computer – for ethical reasons. They had their brains scanned while doing these tasks.

What they found that was surprising is that those who were more aggressive against out-group members had greater activation of reward circuits in the brain suggesting that this is driven be reward rather than anger or other mechanisms. Specifically, the nucleus accumbens and ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

This reward circuitry was also associated with the mount they excluded the out-group from other activities. Though this has been measured in other contexts and the research points to this rewarding experience the researchers were most surprised by the strength of the effect in what is a “weak” out-group. A rival university is, in the big scale of things, not a very strong out-group such as the ones that are constructed in a divisive political atmosphere or on the global stage.

So sad to say that reward for punishing others seems to drive, to a large extent, in- and out-grouping and harming others. Fortunately, we now know this and fortunately not everybody exhibits this to excessive degrees

Andy Habermacher

Andy Habermacher

Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.

Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).

twitter / LinkedIn

Reference

Emily Lasko, Abigale C Dagher, Samuel James West, David Chester. 
Neural Mechanisms of Intergroup Exclusion and Retaliatory Aggression
Social Neuroscience, 2022

More Quick Hits

COVID on the Brain

COVID on the Brain

Many COVID-19 patients have reported various neurological symptoms – the well-known brain fog, but also headaches and decreased cognitive function over months and extended periods of time. This even without serious infection or hospitalization. The research seems to...

Neurodivergence and the lonely brain

Neurodivergence and the lonely brain

Quick HitsDaily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences eurodivergence is term that describes those that are not “neurotypical” such as those with autism and ADHD. In the surge of research into loneliness spurred by the pandemic it has...

Art Engages the Social brain

Art Engages the Social brain

Quick HitsDaily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences reported in last week’s Quick Hits on how engaging in the arts has a relationship with self-control and avoidance of disagreeable and criminal behaviour and that is why this...