Quick Hits
Daily brief research updates from the cognitive sciences

Social mingling of mice can be controlled by zapping certain brain regions
There has been plenty of research into brain areas that contribute to our social brain but these researchers around Stephen Mague at Duke University went a step, or two, further and managed to identify a network that controls social mingling in mice. What’s more they could then manipulate the network to make the mice more, or less, gregarious.
First off, the researchers identified eight regions that are known to be involved in social aspects of behaviour. They then made recordings from these areas in social scenarios. The multiple readings from these areas (which are immense amounts of data in themselves) were then fed into an AI tool that then tried to identify patterns in this complex set of data.
The AI tool, after going through its learning, could then accurately predict which mice would be more social or not from their activation patterns in this network. This shows that the social brain is a network rather than a region.
However, the more fascinating part of this study is that the researchers were than able to manipulate how social these mice were by activating different areas of the network through a technique called optogenetics, zapping and activating parts of this network with laser light and thereby making the mice more, or less, gregarious.
This highlights that the brain operates in networks rather than specific modules or regions and this also opens the path to more refined work in the future focusing on networks and using AI to identify neural patterns.

Andy Habermacher
Andy is author of leading brains Review, Neuroleadership, and multiple other books. He has been intensively involved in writing and research into neuroleadership and is considered one of Europe’s leading experts. He is also a well-known public speaker speaking on the brain and human behaviour.
Andy is also a masters athlete (middle distance running) and competes regularly at international competitions (and holds a few national records in his age category).
Reference
Stephen D. Mague, Austin Talbot, Cameron Blount, Kathryn K. Walder-Christensen, Lara J. Duffney, Elise Adamson, Alexandra L. Bey, Nkemdilim Ndubuizu, Gwenaëlle E. Thomas, Dalton N. Hughes, Yael Grossman, Rainbo Hultman, Saurabh Sinha, Alexandra M. Fink, Neil M. Gallagher, Rachel L. Fisher, Yong-Hui Jiang, David E. Carlson, Kafui Dzirasa.
Brain-wide electrical dynamics encode individual appetitive social behavior.
Neuron, 2022; DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.02.016
More Quick Hits
What is the Impact of Gaming on Teenage Mental Health?
Many parents might be worried that gaming will have negative impacts on their children’s mental health – not true. Or only for a small subset…
Why Children Learn More Quickly Than Adults
It might be obvious that kids learn quicker than adults – but this shows for the first time why.
Right, so artificial networks also need sleep!
We need sleep but we are biological entities – that artificial networks improve performance with sleep is pretty fascinating, and insightful.
Making Voting More Effective for Better Decisions
Most of the most important decisions made in business and society are the result of votes – but not all voting methods are equally effective…
We’re Bad at Remembering How Happy We Were
The past ain’t always better – according to this latest research at least…
100 Years of Research Reveal the Most Effective Methods for Learning
New technologies, new research? No, the old methods are the best, and it’s surprisingly simple.